CSERD


  • userhome
  • catalog
  • resources
  • help

Elemental Absorption and Emission Spectra


Shodor > CSERD > Catalog > Elemental Absorption and Emission Spectra

  • summary
  • readreviews
  • addreviews

5 Published Reviews


VerificationReview by Steve Hudson
(Solicited by Shawn Sendlinger)
Published / Modified 186 months 18 days ago
The applet worked as advertised. Some documentation would make it more user friendly. It could be improved if the spectra could be viewed more closely. This would make it easier to use the cursor to determine frequencies and also make splitting observable It would be very nice for the splitting of the Na line for example.
Usability of the resource: Very usable
Platform(s) tested: winxp
Browser(s) tested: explorer

VerificationReview by Diana Tanase
Published / Modified 196 months 13 days ago
The software works well and is very simple. While it is fairly self-explanatory, some documentation should be included and is not currently.
Usability of the resource: Very usable
Platform(s) tested: osx
Browser(s) tested: safari, firefox

ValidationReview by Jonathan Hassinger
Published / Modified 196 months 13 days ago
The information that the review was based off of can be found in the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1st Student Edition 1988 by CRC Press Pages E-150 through E-271. It was found, upon inspection of 10 elements that the information provided through the applet is very valid. When compared to the actual values for visual spectral emissions, the numbers recorded in the applet were very close. The root mean squared of the percent differences produces an astoundingly low 0.265. It can also be noted that being the program only claims accuracy to 4 digits, thereby producing only integers for out put, this 0.265 difference when compared to the actual non-integer numbers of the spectral emissions is amazing. In addition to these points, it was also noted that for hydrogen all visual emissions for the element were represented in the applet correctly. It is not known if this accuracy persists for all the elements listed in the applet, however the checks that were performed for the elements observed confirmed that a number of random actual emissions selected were represented in the applet properly. Because of both of these facts it can be concluded that the applet is very valid. It would be wise however to have a numerical output window capable of opening and providing all the emission frequencies for each of the elements so that more accurate data can be collected.
Usability of the resource: Very usable

GuidedVerificationReview by Jonathan Hassinger
Published / Modified 196 months 13 days ago
Usability of the resource: Very usable
Code runs without problems: Yes
Comments: The applet was very easy to use.
Did the code crash: Never
Works in Explorer: Fully Compatible
Works in Firefox: Fully Compatible
Works in Mozilla: Fully Compatible
Comments: The user interface was self-explanatory.
Does the model require browser add-ons: No
Does the model require a specific operating system: No
Does the model run outside a browser: No
Sufficient documentation to understand basics: Yes
Sufficient documentation to select required inputs: Yes
Sufficient to understand outputs: Yes
Are the stated assumptions reasonable: Yes
Comments: As of right now the information to understand the applet is in the javalab directory applet. It might be wise to include this information in a read-me in the actual applet so that the applet stands on its own.
Based on known physical laws: Yes
Derivations in model used correctly: Yes
Did you run tests with experimental data: Yes
Comments: The information that the review was based off of can be found in the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1st Student Edition 1988 by CRC Press Pages E-150 through E-271. It was found, upon inspection of 10 elements that the information provided through the applet is very valid. When compared to the actual values for visual spectral emissions, the numbers recorded in the applet were very close. The root mean squared of the percent differences produces an astoundingly low 0.265. It can also be noted that being the program only claims accuracy to 4 digits, thereby producing only integers for out put, this 0.265 difference when compared to the actual non-integer numbers of the spectral emissions is amazing. In addition to these points, it was also noted that for hydrogen all visual emissions for the element were represented in the applet correctly. It is not known if this accuracy persists for all the elements listed in the applet, however the checks that were performed for the elements observed confirmed that a number of random actual emissions selected were represented in the applet properly. Because of both of these facts it can be concluded that the applet is very valid.
Recommended improvements: It would be wise to have a numerical output window capable of opening and providing all the emission frequencies for each of the elements so that more accurate data can be collected.

GuidedAccreditationReview by Jonathan Hassinger
Published / Modified 196 months 13 days ago
Usability of the resource: Usable
Objectives of model clearly stated: Yes
Assumptions of model clearly stated: Yes
Constraints on model clearly stated: No
Adequate instructions provided: Yes
Comments: It would be wise to include all information in the applet so that it may stand on its own.
Rating: Very Good
Is there an instructor's guide: No
Help easily available: No
Student activities provided: No
Site easy to navigate: Yes
Usability Rating: Excellent
Are pre-requisites identified: No
Is the audience identified: No
Comments: This applet should is not recommended for younger audiences because it is based off of a difficult concept to understand. ', 'Scientific/Proffesional', 'Educator', 'High School', 'College']
K-12 standards alignment provided: No
Standards alignment suggestions: This applet can be used to meet the National Science Education requirement for Physical Science which states students should understand the interactions between matter and energy.
Necessary software referenced for lesson: No
Necessary software referenced for model: Yes
Suggested improvements: Yes
Comments: Having a numerical output window would make the model more usable for students with unsteady hands.
Material could be expanded to other grade levels: No
Special arrangements made for disabled: No
Special arrangements made for blind: No
Special arrangements made for deaf: No

Not Logged In. Login
©1994-2024 Shodor    Licensing