Please Anwser these Evaluation Questions.

Please take some time to answer the following questions regarding this Web-based Educational framework for Analysis, Visualization, and Experimentation. You may print-out this page, fill it out, and mail it to:

Henri Gavin
Dept. Civil Engineering
Duke University Box 90287
Durham NC 27708-0287

(A web-based evaluation feedback facility will be implemented soon.)

Key:

NA	=	not applicable
1	=	strongly disagree
2	=	disagree
3	=	neither agree nor disagree
4	=	agree
5	=	strongly agree

How well did it work?
1a. The tutorial was easy to follow.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
1b. It was obvious when to play the movies.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
1c. The movies downloaded in a timely manner.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
1d. The movies were clear and easy to follow.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
1e. The play, fast-forward, rewind and pause functions were useful.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
1f. The data files associated with the movies were useful.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
1g. The Java applet worked.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
1h. I learned something by using the Java applet.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
1i. I was able to reset the Java applet and re-run the simulation.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
1j. I was able to answer the questions following the simulation in the Java applet.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
1k. Using this instructional module was better than the actual, live, experimental lab.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
1l. It would still be useful to do the actual experiment myself.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
1m. It would help to have a TA around when I used this module.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
How much did I learn?
2a. The introduction gave a clear understanding of the learning objectives.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
2b. The pace and level of this module was too advanced for my background.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
2c. The pace and level of this module was too slow to keep my interest.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
2d. I skipped over most of the math in the tutorial.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
2e. Most of the equations in this tutorial were too hard to understand.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
2f. Reviewing the tutorial helped me understand the experiment.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
2g. I am comfortable creating stress-strain curves from raw data.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
Was the module presented attractively?
3a. The web-pages were attractively presented.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
3b. The web-pages were easy to follow.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
3c. It was easy navigate through the various web-pages.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
3d. I liked having the tutorial broken-up into hyper-linked web-pages.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
3e. I would rather use a tutorial that was printed out in one long document.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
3f. Color was used effectively.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
3g. I spent [1=10, 2=20, 3=30, 4=40, 5=50] minutes working on this lab.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
About me.
4a. I am a [1-4] year engineering undergrad or [5] grad student.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
4b. I am a [1:BME, 2:CEE, 3:ECE, 4:MEMS] major.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
4c. I already knew something about the tensile test before I ran this module.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
4d. I ran this module as part of a graded course assignment.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
4e. I ran this module as part of an un-graded course assignment.	NA 1 2 3 4 5
4f. I ran this module because I just found it and it looked interesting.	NA 1 2 3 4 5

Please take some time to provide additional written feedback and explanations for any of the above questions.

1. What did you like best?
2. What did you like least?
3. What would you change if you could?
4. What other kinds of instructional modules you would like to see implemented in this system?

Downloadable Microsoft Word document available here